Michael
E. Lawson, Ronald
G. Stover, Gary A. Goreham, Donna J. Hess,
Stephen G. Sapp and George A. Youngs
Several themes are apparent in the producers’ attitudes about agricultural biotechnology. First, these producers tend to take a pragmatic approach to the use of agricultural biotechnology; they believe such
technology should be evaluated by the consequences of its use. Second, they expressed particular
concern about acceptance of GMOs; an over-whelming majority of producers are concerned about
the future acceptance of GMOs by consumers both at home and abroad. Third, producers do not
perceive a connection between GMOs and agricultural surplus. Most do not believe their use will harm
farmers by increasing surpluses, nor do most assume their use will help farmers by creating new uses
for their crops. Fourth, agricultural producers view the segregation of GM crops as problematic: most
think it impractical and many would choose not to plant GM crops if segregation were mandated. Fifth,
producers do not accept that agricultural technology should be owned; rather, they think it should be
publicly available. Sixth, they tend to express caution about the use of agricultural technology. While few
believe GMO’s pose any serious health risks, many think GM crops should be grown only when minimal
risk has been demonstrated. Finally, certified organic farmers are substantially different from conventional
farmers in their assumptions, attitudes, values, and farming activities pertaining to GM seeds and crops.
As much as conventional farmers are supportive of their use, certified organic farmers are resistant to them.
To read the entire report, click on the title of this summary.